Climate Change Continued.
- Francois Woody
- Sep 26, 2015
- 2 min read
I was having a discussion with some co-workers and friends the other day concerning Chemtrails, and I decided to take this tack in the conversation: As I have repeated, chemtrails first began to appear in 1962, or 53 years ago. You can consider this the "experimental" time period. Going back an equal number of years from their first appearance, we arrive at the year of 1909. Consider this the "control" time period. I sought to substantiate the claims that I have made. One of the major claims of climate change is unusually extreme weather patterns. What I did was have my staff account for each category 4 and 5 storm that made landfall in the US from 1909 up until the present day, and graph or chart it. The sample size rules out any anomalies that may arise by pure chance. Accounting for the fact that there was most likely some sort of lag involved in the metals taking effect, the research seems to validate my claims: there is an obvious correlation between chemtrail activity and extreme weather. The US government admits this, and so do major academic institutions. I don't have the time or wherewithal to do this myself, but you are welcome to test it yourself. It checks out. Speaking of climate change, I needed to address the push for carbon taxes and cap and trade policies. In not too many years, we here in the US (and other aligned nations) will begin the wireless transmission of energy through radio waves. The effective radiated power being discussed here exceeds the input power by a factor of 10,000. In other words, it is 10,000 times more efficient than current wired transmission methods, regardless of your source fuel. Here's the thing: you could use entirely just coal for these purposes and you would still meet or exceed the aims being pushed for by carbon taxes and cap and trade policies. Cars running on liquified natural gas and wireless energy need to be thrown into the discussion, as well. What am I saying? These methods are totally and completely unnecessary, and there is no need to cut ourselves off at the knees trying to reach this goal here. The economic pain involved is simply not worth the effort, and I make the case that cap and trade/carbon taxes need to be thrown right in the trash. Think about it.





Comments